Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Michael Kefalianos trains 3 days out from the 2011 Australian Pro. Can he qualify for the Mr O?

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Michael Kefalianos trains 3 days out from the 2011 Australian Pro. Can he qualify for the Mr O?

    IFBB Pro Michael Kefalianos (MHP) is once again out to prove that he is Mr Olympia qualification material this Saturday at the 2011 Australian Pro Grand Prix. Last year the Greek/Australian bodybuilder came just shy of an O qualification with thee fourth and two fifth places.

    In this video, we check out Kefalianos three days out at 240 lbs depleted. His US manager Kostas Marangopoulos gives us the inside scoop on whats going on with Michael and what changes he has made in the off season to shoot for that so far elusive Mr. O qualification


  • #2
    Hope Mike takes what he deserves this time!!He is great!
    "“Laugh as much as you breathe and love as long as you live.”"

    Comment


    • #3
      I have Dan Hill winning the Australian Pro.
      Pain is Temporary, Pride is Forever

      Comment


      • #4
        Why is he doing lat pulldowns behind the neck? They are so bad for you....

        Comment


        • #5
          They allow for better contraction in the rhomboid or lower traps but are not ideal for the neck.

          Comment


          • #6
            LOL

            245lbs MY ASS

            But sill looks great, crappy structure but always best conditioning on stage.

            Comment


            • #7
              Originally posted by OTIS View Post
              I have Dan Hill winning the Australian Pro.
              no disrespect but dan hill looks like shit. he looks like a state level competitor.

              Comment


              • #8
                Originally posted by rockybaudoin05 View Post
                no disrespect but dan hill looks like shit. he looks like a state level competitor.
                he was being sarcastic
                I am the way, the truth, and the life: no man comes to the Father, but by Me.
                JESUS THE CHRIST

                Comment


                • #9
                  Michael is in top conditioning. I' m sure that he can qualify!!!

                  Good luck Mike!!!

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Kefalianos looks great, will be a nice show although there are so few athletes..... it is weird!

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Originally posted by RockyIII View Post
                      he was being sarcastic
                      ok, i was a little worried about this cat

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Originally posted by KINic View Post
                        They allow for better contraction in the rhomboid or lower traps but are not ideal for the neck.
                        “LAT” PULL DOWN ANALYSIS© Dave Mansfield MA, MSPT, CSCS
                        “Is it safe to do a behind the neck lat pull down?” A question that should be, but is never, heard at health clubs and clinics all over “fitness land” as trainees blissfully go on doing the exercise to “hit the lats and upper back”. Lat pull downs behind the neck are potentially dangerous and always unnecessary in your fitness or rehab plan. Let’s take a look at this from a biomechanical point of view. The primary reason that this exercise is potentially dangerous is that it places the shoulder at a severe biomechanical disadvantage.
                        The end range of upper extremity external rotation and abduction places increased stress on the inferior glenohumeral ligament. Add resistance and repetitions and you place one of the primary stabilizers of the joint at risk. In addition, many of those who use this exercise have a tendency to pull the bar down ballistically which has the very real possibility of causing trauma to the cervical spine by impact of the bar on the spinous process. The glenohumeral joint, as we know, sacrifices stability for mobility.
                        The joint capsule allows for significant displacement of the joint anteriorly and inferiorly during movement. The joint is protected superiorly by coraco-acromial arch. That is comprised of the coracoid process, the acromium and their ligaments. Anteriorly the joint is protected by the three aspects of the glenohumeral ligament the transverse humeral ligament and the coracohumeral ligament. There is no major passive restraint inferiorly to the joint inferiorly.
                        Since the glenohumeral joint is externally rotated to about 90 degrees and more throughout both concentric and eccentric phases of the pull down there is increased stress on the external rotators of the rotator cuff (supraspinatus, infraspinatus and teres minor) to stabilize the joint. The performance of the behind the neck pull down puts the torso and cervical spine in flexion in order to place the bar behind the head. As a result, the glenohumeral joint is placed in adduction, external rotation, extension and abduction. This position places severe anterior and inferior stress on the joint while it is under load.
                        A serious strength trainee with currently healthy shoulders might consider the risk worth taking if it would lead to attainment of strength or hypertrophy of the involved muscles. However, as demonstrated in a recently published study, the benefit is not worth the risk! It turns out that the front pull down works the same muscle groups just as, if not more effectively, than it’s wayward cousin (the behind the neck pull down).
                        In this study 10 rep max pull downs were looked at using four techniques:
                        • • •
                        close, neutral grip, front pull down close, supinated grip front pull down wide grip front pull down
                        • wide grip behind the neck pull down
                        The results are summarized as follows. Front wide grip pull downs resulted in the highest latissimus EMG activity. There was no difference in the other groups. There was no difference in any of the grips for teres major activity. ( These results were the same for both concentric and eccentric portions of the lift). Rear deltoid activity was higher for all three front movements than for the behind the neck variation. (Eccentrically, the close grip had the greatest activity). Other muscles looked at were the pectoralis (close grip provided the most activity) and the triceps (wide grip front provided the most activity).
                        The bottom line is that you can effectively train the lats and the teres major (and to a much lesser degree the pecs and triceps) using the lat pull down. There is no evidence that the behind the neck version is superior but there is plenty of evidence of the risks. Conclusion: do pull downs to the front.

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          Originally posted by cdogg View Post
                          “LAT” PULL DOWN ANALYSIS© Dave Mansfield MA, MSPT, CSCS
                          “Is it safe to do a behind the neck lat pull down?” A question that should be, but is never, heard at health clubs and clinics all over “fitness land” as trainees blissfully go on doing the exercise to “hit the lats and upper back”. Lat pull downs behind the neck are potentially dangerous and always unnecessary in your fitness or rehab plan. Let’s take a look at this from a biomechanical point of view. The primary reason that this exercise is potentially dangerous is that it places the shoulder at a severe biomechanical disadvantage.
                          The end range of upper extremity external rotation and abduction places increased stress on the inferior glenohumeral ligament. Add resistance and repetitions and you place one of the primary stabilizers of the joint at risk. In addition, many of those who use this exercise have a tendency to pull the bar down ballistically which has the very real possibility of causing trauma to the cervical spine by impact of the bar on the spinous process. The glenohumeral joint, as we know, sacrifices stability for mobility.
                          The joint capsule allows for significant displacement of the joint anteriorly and inferiorly during movement. The joint is protected superiorly by coraco-acromial arch. That is comprised of the coracoid process, the acromium and their ligaments. Anteriorly the joint is protected by the three aspects of the glenohumeral ligament the transverse humeral ligament and the coracohumeral ligament. There is no major passive restraint inferiorly to the joint inferiorly.
                          Since the glenohumeral joint is externally rotated to about 90 degrees and more throughout both concentric and eccentric phases of the pull down there is increased stress on the external rotators of the rotator cuff (supraspinatus, infraspinatus and teres minor) to stabilize the joint. The performance of the behind the neck pull down puts the torso and cervical spine in flexion in order to place the bar behind the head. As a result, the glenohumeral joint is placed in adduction, external rotation, extension and abduction. This position places severe anterior and inferior stress on the joint while it is under load.
                          A serious strength trainee with currently healthy shoulders might consider the risk worth taking if it would lead to attainment of strength or hypertrophy of the involved muscles. However, as demonstrated in a recently published study, the benefit is not worth the risk! It turns out that the front pull down works the same muscle groups just as, if not more effectively, than it’s wayward cousin (the behind the neck pull down).
                          In this study 10 rep max pull downs were looked at using four techniques:
                          • • •
                          close, neutral grip, front pull down close, supinated grip front pull down wide grip front pull down
                          • wide grip behind the neck pull down
                          The results are summarized as follows. Front wide grip pull downs resulted in the highest latissimus EMG activity. There was no difference in the other groups. There was no difference in any of the grips for teres major activity. ( These results were the same for both concentric and eccentric portions of the lift). Rear deltoid activity was higher for all three front movements than for the behind the neck variation. (Eccentrically, the close grip had the greatest activity). Other muscles looked at were the pectoralis (close grip provided the most activity) and the triceps (wide grip front provided the most activity).
                          The bottom line is that you can effectively train the lats and the teres major (and to a much lesser degree the pecs and triceps) using the lat pull down. There is no evidence that the behind the neck version is superior but there is plenty of evidence of the risks. Conclusion: do pull downs to the front.
                          i agree only because i only feel the behind the neck pulldown in my romboids and not in my lats
                          I am the way, the truth, and the life: no man comes to the Father, but by Me.
                          JESUS THE CHRIST

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            i think he will crack the top ten if conditions on point, idk bout top 3, wayyy to much competition!!!

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              Should be top 3 for sure.

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X