LOL....what can someone even say about this? I wasn't aware that exact mg dosages coressponded with specific bodyweights, as if one is doing a math problem (LOL), because after all, as GH15 says...."When you maxed at trenbolona and propionets at 200 lbs and 6% (I wasn't aware that everyone had to be using Test and Tren to hit 200 lbs at 6%, but apparently it's true becaue GH15 "never" lies), the only thing that will push you to 220 lbs at 6% will be addition of testosterona at 1-1.5 grams with GH". I wonder how I hit 230 lbs at about 10% before I ever touched a drug in my life? I must've been reading my scale wrong and using rigged BF calipers.
Plateaus in BB'ing are always broken with the addtion of more drugs? Hmmmm???? I guess no one has ever refined their diet and made additional msucle gains......or no one has ever learned how to train more effectively and made additional gains that way either, right? It's good to know Plateaus are "always" broken with larger doses of drugs....and not just any drugs, but rather, specific drugs in exact dosages, which are sure to yeild a specific increase in muscle tissue for anyone who adheres to such a protocol.
Also, don't ever forget your anabolics, as it is very important to make sure the anabolics are there "big time"....and these anabolics must be 300 mg of EQ and 100 mg of npp in the same syringe, in the asscheek. Of course, there are ZERO other AAS that can take their place, right? Of course, it's GOT to be those two (and in the asscheek, remember)! A BBr certainly couldn't substitue other anabolics and get the same or ever better results, could they? After all, why bother using some of the other great non-methylated injectables we have today, as only EQ and Nandrolone can get the job done right! Drugs like Trestolone and Dihydroboldenone, both more potent non-toxic muscle builders than EQ and Nandrolone, are a no-no.....and let's not even mention drugs such as dimethylmasteron, even though it is a very potent mass-builder. We must listen to Nasser because he's never wrong AND he's a retired pro, so that means he knows everything about how to best use these drugs for growth, regardless of the individual's circumstances. Let's never mind the fact that the game has advanced since the 90's when Nasser was around and while the basics have remained the same, we now know more than ever and because of our ever increasing knowledge, we have learned some new ways of doing things which are an improvment from Nasser's day.
Truly, it is all too obvious Nasser has not left 1997 and thinks no one else has either. Is someone going to make great gains on 2-3 grams of test, a bunch of Tren, Mast, Nandrolone, EQ....while throwing 15-30 IU of GH on top of it? Of course, but is this really revolutionary knowledge here? LOL. If you do what Nasser says, will you get big? Most likely, assuming you have the genetics for it. Is Nasser's way more effective than many other ways? Yep...sure is, but again I would ask....who doesn't know that running a few grams of test is important in getting as big as possible? Who in BB'ing doesn't understand Tren's place in a BB'rs program and how effective it is for fat-loss, hardness, density, strength, and growth? Are there any serious BB'rs who aren't completely familiar with EQ, Nanrolone, GH, or Slin? How many serious competitive BB'rs don't know what these drugs are and what they do? Nasser acts as if the very basic knowledge he shares about these drugs and the effects they give is some secret, when in reality this is very common knowledge in the BB'ing world.
If Nasser prefers EQ and Nandrolone to other anabolics, great...no problem there, they're solid drugs, but his idea that they are necessary for making gains as quickly as possible and for achieving a round, full look to the muscles is ludicrous. This may have been true 20 years ago when we had less options for effective injectables which could be used long-term, but not today. I personally really like both EQ and Nandrolone, but would never be so foolish as to say either are vital in creating ones best physique. When it comes to drugs like Test, Tren and GH....yes, they ARE vital in becoming one's best, but not Boldenone and Nandrolone. Also, Nasser's idea that Mast is necessary in every cycle because of it's anti-estrogenic effects is also silly. That's a very old-school idea, from back in the day when were were still in the pre-AI era and anti-estrogenic AAS were absolutely necessary for combating estrogenic side effects, such as water retention and gyno. However, we now know through scientific research that today's AIs are far superior for managing estrogen than anti-estrogenic drugs such as Masteron. The fact that we now have unbridled access to these AIs eliminates the need to run anti-estrogenic drugs with every heavily aromatizing cycle. If Nasser understood this, he would realize it is not necessary to use Mast with every off-season cycle.
Still....the moral of this story is that if you want to break through a plateau, then fuck looking at any other aspects of your program, because regardless of how you eat or train, it doesn't mean shit....then only way to break through a plateau is to up the dose....and it must be the exact cycle Nasser outlines or you will never get there. Afterall, Nasser NEVER lies (I wonder how many pros who knew Nasser are LOL'ing at this statement?).