Muscular Development Forums - Powered by vBulletin

Page 4 of 6 FirstFirst 123456 LastLast
Results 52 to 68 of 87

Thread: Jay 2001 vs Phil 2011

  1. #52
    Bro Scientist bigrgc's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Posts
    4,535

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by SomeKindofMonster View Post
    The lighting for the 2011 pictures rivals the famous
    Ironman lighting and comparing pics from 2009 to 2011
    is going to benefit it in Heath's favor.
    Here's Jay from an Ironman 2002 or 2003.
    Also after watching number 13 I realized how much smaller
    Phil is compared to a 1999Coleman or 2009 Jay. Heath is fantastic
    but is not dominate like Yates, Coleman or a in shape Jay.
    Jay looked a mess in 2011 with his delts way down from his injury and
    his stomach area just looked very wide. Not like this pic at all.
    Fuckin nuts! Like I said, that 2001 showing was the best physique to not take the Olympia title. Yes Ronnie had better back, but Jay had better everything else. Bodybuilding should be judged on the WHOLE PHYSIQUE, not just the back. It took the judges over a decade to finally figure this out.. even tho the judging guidelines are very clear
    All statements made herein are fictional and are solely for entertainment purposes

  2. #53
    Mini Forklift Ⓥ
    Guest

    Default

    Some of the shots a day out from the 09 Olympia Jay looked frckin awesome. And seeing as you guys like comparison shots, this might make some of you laugh...




    That's the photo that I was reminded of when I look at Jay in that shot.

  3. #54
    Spotter cutlerdisciple's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Posts
    375
    Gender
    Male

    Default

    ^jay's chest has never looked fuller!

  4. #55
    Amateur Threat bantamweightchamp2012's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Posts
    1,899
    Gender
    Male

    Default

    ronnie is photo shopped here...come on man lol

  5. #56
    Amateur Threat bantamweightchamp2012's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Posts
    1,899
    Gender
    Male

    Default

    i agree with you alot on here bro...but Phil 2011 would fucking destroy Jay Culter even 2001......Phil is the genetic phenomenon of bodybuilding

  6. #57
    Spotter cutlerdisciple's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Posts
    375
    Gender
    Male

    Default

    phil takes the back shots, and cutler takes the rest

  7. #58
    Atlas Pitbull9's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Location
    Fort Ree NJ
    Posts
    15,057
    Gender
    Male

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by cutlerdisciple View Post
    phil takes the back shots, and cutler takes the rest
    Fuck that i have Jay winning everywhere dammit!

  8. #59
    Amateur Threat bantamweightchamp2012's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Posts
    1,899
    Gender
    Male

    Default

    Coleman photoshoped here
    Quote Originally Posted by SomeKindofMonster View Post
    Just for fun throwing in a prime Coleman
    in the mix.

  9. #60
    Amateur Threat bantamweightchamp2012's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Posts
    1,899
    Gender
    Male

    Default

    he had something in there ..implants or injections....
    Quote Originally Posted by juxtaposedhearts0 View Post
    Ronnie didn't have calves Jose? LAWL

  10. #61
    Amateur Threat bantamweightchamp2012's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Posts
    1,899
    Gender
    Male

    Default

    i agree with you alot on here bro...but Phil 2011 would fucking destroy Jay Culter even 2001......Phil is the genetic phenomenon of bodybuilding

    He even makes coleman look like shit......
    Quote Originally Posted by bigrgc View Post
    Fuckin nuts! Like I said, that 2001 showing was the best physique to not take the Olympia title. Yes Ronnie had better back, but Jay had better everything else. Bodybuilding should be judged on the WHOLE PHYSIQUE, not just the back. It took the judges over a decade to finally figure this out.. even tho the judging guidelines are very clear

  11. #62
    Beach Body DarinD's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    NJ
    Posts
    890
    Gender
    Male

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by bantamweightchamp2012 View Post
    i agree with you alot on here bro...but Phil 2011 would fucking destroy Jay Culter even 2001......Phil is the genetic phenomenon of bodybuilding

    He even makes coleman look like shit......
    Not a chance. Jay would make Phil look tiny. Jay in 01 easily beats 2011 Phil. Jay was his best in 01.

  12. #63
    Mini Forklift Ⓥ
    Guest

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by DarinD View Post
    Not a chance. Jay would make Phil look tiny. Jay in 01 easily beats 2011 Phil. Jay was his best in 01.
    Yeah, I have to agree.

  13. #64
    Amateur Threat
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Posts
    1,000

    Default

    Phil,but 2001 version of jay would be pretty competitive.

  14. #65
    Spotter cutlerdisciple's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Posts
    375
    Gender
    Male

    Default

    some 01 vs 11 pics



    imo jay smokes him from the front

  15. #66
    Amateur Threat Portillo.'s Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Location
    Sydney
    Posts
    1,233
    Gender
    Male

    Default

    Jays tan looks awful.

  16. #67
    Spotter cutlerdisciple's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Posts
    375
    Gender
    Male

    Default

    and phil taking jay in the back shots






  17. #68
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jun 2012
    Posts
    45
    Gender
    Male

    Default

    Ronnie makes both look like little girls.

Page 4 of 6 FirstFirst 123456 LastLast

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •