Somewhat off-topic, but:
1) I, personally, would have put Mike ahead of Roelly,
2) it's a close call either way,
3) I just wanted to point out how awesomely assinine the phrase "This is a semi-accurate analogy" really is, as we all know that "semi-accurate" means "not accurate".
Really? Look at a dictionary Lifepulse, as we all know that attaching "semi" to the beginning of a word does NOT mean inaccurate, but rather, according to the dictionary definition, is defined as.........
A latin word meaning "half" and freely pre-fixed to any word of English origin, with the meaning of "partially", "somewhat", or "incompletely".
In other words, it's proper use is exactly as I have used it, which means that I inferred that my analogy was "partially" accurate, as I could not think of a better one right off the top of my head. Regardless, it wasn't necessary, as it conveyed my point "accurately".
So, the next time you make an ass of yourself by ripping on the "proper" use of a pre-fix in someone' post (LOL), look it up in the damn dictionary. So, it appears YOU are the one who is "not accurate".
I mean, Mike, you are a good writer (mostly)
Remember, no one here is proof-reading their posts (not all the time, at least), which means that spelling errors, sentence structure and grammer can all be shaky, especially if one is an non-proficient typer . In addition, sometimes we just don't give a shit and don't feel like "correcting" a poorly written paragraph, especially when we're ass tired, as long as the point gets through. So, who really gives a shit whether I am a good or not so good writer...no one here does!
, and fairly good at arguing, but sometimes, unfortunately, you come off as the most rationalizing douche I've ever had the misfortune of reading-- a shame, given how close-to-smart you seem at times.
Thanks! I am glad I have met your definition of "close to smart".
Sometimes you just need to back down the over-the-top intensity of your arguments about 5%,
Why? I am who I am and it is NOT going to change. If someone can't handle a simple fucking internet debate about BB'rs, I would hate to see how they handle real life situations that actually matter!
and quit with some of the needless name-calling, and you might actually get a few people to agree with you here and there.
I have an ass-load of people that agree with me every damn day on this site. My PM's are at fucking 400 right now over just a couple of months, with about 100 of them unanswered because I don't have the time.
You see, the thing is, I don't call people names unless I am attcaked first. I have a lot of respect for a lot of people here and have numerous friends that feel likewise. I may attack what I feel is an assinine post, but I don't attack the individual. It is only when people can't handle criticism of their posts of opinions, that I get called names and in turn, they get theirs. Look at any incident and you will see this is true.
Sorry, but this is a fucking BB'ing forum which is ALL about opinions. If someone can't handle someone disagreeing with them, maybe they shouldn't post. Fortunately, most people here understand this an don't let this shit get to them.
On other forums, my attitude is MUCH different; much less argumentative. Do you EVER come to the Chem-E section. If you did, you would see that I have a good amount of respect for everyone there (unless they are straight morons, which there aren't too many) and am always willing to help everyone with whatever they need.
Not that this has anything to do with the placings at the Austrialia, I just am getting sick of you thinking you're the only individual with a brain on these boards.
Wrong again! There are plenty of intelligent people on this forum that I have a lot of respect for. Personally, I really don't give a fuck about what you think. If you don't like my posts, don't fucking read them! For someone that is getting tired of "reading" my posts, why in the hell are you still reading them? Doesn't make a lot of sense, does it?
Usually, it's the guys that don't take my shit and post back, but actually have legitimate rebutals to offer, that gain my respect. It's the "your a douche, go suck a dick" posters that don't gain my respect. I can take any amount of harsh talk in the world, but you better have a good fucking point that is relevant to the thread!
You can spare yourself this whole stressfull online situation through bypassing my posts.
The strongly opinionated will always take heat because they are expected to not stir the shit. Look at GFR. Smart guy. A lot of people hate him, but an equal amount love him. Did you ever notice it's always the one's who can't handle any type of pressure or criticism that end up hating him. In other words, it's the guys that take this shit so seriously that they can't see that this is all here just for fun. Why do most of the more intelligent, bolder and more influential one's usually end up liking him? I'll let you figure that one out while you realize that you are NOT the MD police.
In the mean time, thnaks for the comment. People like you make No-bull more fun.