Announcement

Collapse

Registration by Invite Only

Because of the email regisration being abused, registration will be by invitation only.
The Invitation must come from a No Bull member of 1 year or more, and it must be sent to Jen directly with an email address and username of the invitee.

Thanks for your cooperation.
See more
See less

3.5 grams

Collapse
X
Collapse
 
  • Page of 2
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
Previous 1 2 template Next
  • #1

    3.5 grams

    I read a few diff people say that the receptor saturation point is 3.5 grams recently

    when your at the elite level, and doing what it takes to maximize possibility to win is a given, why WOULDNT a pro use that amount in the offseason during a blast? And if this info is new to science, then people SHOULD be using that much in a muscle building cycle, if thats your job to compete at that high level and win. When your bloods look like an morbidly obese 70 year old when running 2 grams a week, whats really holding a person back from the 3.5 mark? At 1-2 grams, your not concerned about health, so wouldnt said BB almost be stupid not to run 3.5, if being a champion is the goal?


    In BIgger faster stronger, there was alot of that talk about doing what it takes to win. Well if we now know that its 3.5 grams a week at the upper limit, then guys should be doing no more and no less (genetics aside, ya i know, many factors weigh into this...) during certain stages of prep.
    "Feel ill as fuck - not sure if it is protein powder or tren?"-bigdog123
    Tags: None
  • #2
    Good point, if it was actually conclusively provable. What if the difference between 2 grams a week and 3.5 grams was a 1% increase in muscle. Or what if it was 0%?
    All posts are for entertainment and may contain fiction. Consult a doctor before using any medication.

    Comment

    • #3
      Yeah i guess we would need to see the relationship of muscle gain for each dose.
      But even at 1 percent, at the elite level, my point is that a person who wants to be champion, would most likely go for the extra 1 percent
      "Feel ill as fuck - not sure if it is protein powder or tren?"-bigdog123

      Comment

      • #4
        Yeah, if it was conclusive I could agree however its not.
        All posts are for entertainment and may contain fiction. Consult a doctor before using any medication.

        Comment

        • #5
          3.5 g is probably close to an upper limit but it depends on the drugs the person is taking as well as genetics, experience and overall size. 3.5 g of anadrol a week will kill you, but 3.5 g of test won't. 3.5 g on a 150 lb newb would be a waste but not on an experienced BB'er at a lean 250. I guess the 3.5g/week guideline is gives a rough estimate at just how crazy the doses are sometimes. 10x more or less (350 mg/week or 35 g/week) are clearly way outside of any reasonable amount on either side of the drug dose scale. A range that encompasses about 90% of pro bodybuilders is probably a factor of 2 of the 3.5g/week limit. I.e., 1.75 g - 7 g/week.

          Comment

          • #6
            Originally posted by Langmuir View Post
            3.5 g is probably close to an upper limit but it depends on the drugs the person is taking as well as genetics, experience and overall size. 3.5 g of anadrol a week will kill you, but 3.5 g of test won't. 3.5 g on a 150 lb newb would be a waste but not on an experienced BB'er at a lean 250. I guess the 3.5g/week guideline is gives a rough estimate at just how crazy the doses are sometimes. 10x more or less (350 mg/week or 35 g/week) are clearly way outside of any reasonable amount on either side of the drug dose scale. A range that encompasses about 90% of pro bodybuilders is probably a factor of 2 of the 3.5g/week limit. I.e., 1.75 g - 7 g/week.
            3.5g of drol a week wouldn't kill you, when you post stuff like that, a person not in the know doesn't no you are highly exaggerating and will spew it off as fact at another point..

            Comment

            • #7
              3.5 g drol/week is highly inadvisable. Not to mention unnecessary. Point being that there are a lot of factors that go into the 3.5g/week number op was asking about.

              Comment

              • #8
                Originally posted by Langmuir View Post
                3.5 g drol/week is highly inadvisable. Not to mention unnecessary. Point being that there are a lot of factors that go into the 3.5g/week number op was asking about.
                For sure, agree with these points

                Comment

                • #9
                  Originally posted by JordanW View Post
                  3.5g of drol a week wouldn't kill you, when you post stuff like that, a person not in the know doesn't no you are highly exaggerating and will spew it off as fact at another point..
                  What exactly is the argument for 3.5 grams of Anadrol not destroying your liver and killing you?
                  In the sea of heavy metal, you are plankton.

                  Comment

                  • #10
                    Originally posted by Womanthrower View Post
                    What exactly is the argument for 3.5 grams of Anadrol not destroying your liver and killing you?
                    Because it simply wouldn't happen, anadrol has been highly studied in medical settings. There is a study which examines the use of 400mg a day for three months without any significant impact on liver values. Tons (hundreds) of studies have been done on dosing between 100-200mg a day for months (greater than six in many cases) and many subjects had no change in liver values. The notable issues were blood pressure in some and cholesterol changes over extended periods of time.

                    There is a reason why pharmaceutical grade anadrol is 50mg each while dbol is 5-10 anavar is 2.5-5.

                    I'm not saying people should do it but liver toxicity is a scare tactic side effect that the aas community decided to continue.

                    Comment

                    • #11
                      Originally posted by JordanW View Post
                      Because it simply wouldn't happen, anadrol has been highly studied in medical settings. There is a study which examines the use of 400mg a day for three months without any significant impact on liver values. Tons (hundreds) of studies have been done on dosing between 100-200mg a day for months (greater than six in many cases) and many subjects had no change in liver values. The notable issues were blood pressure in some and cholesterol changes over extended periods of time.

                      There is a reason why pharmaceutical grade anadrol is 50mg each while dbol is 5-10 anavar is 2.5-5.

                      I'm not saying people should do it but liver toxicity is a scare tactic side effect that the aas community decided to continue.
                      Thereīs plenty of people using paracetamol for prolonged period of time in 500-1000mg/day dosage, yet 4000mg in single dose is enough to cause liver failure...Guesstimate and bro science wonīt cut it when it comes to pharmacology my friend.

                      Comment

                      • #12
                        Originally posted by ghostrider View Post
                        Thereīs plenty of people using paracetamol for prolonged period of time in 500-1000mg/day dosage, yet 4000mg in single dose is enough to cause liver failure...Guesstimate and bro science wonīt cut it when it comes to pharmacology my friend.
                        we love da bro science and da carb

                        Comment

                        • #13
                          Originally posted by OldSchool90 View Post
                          we love da bro science and da carb
                          Well I love da carb too, bro science, not so much but I have to admit itīs funny sometimes.

                          Comment

                          • #14
                            Originally posted by ghostrider View Post
                            Thereīs plenty of people using paracetamol for prolonged period of time in 500-1000mg/day dosage, yet 4000mg in single dose is enough to cause liver failure...Guesstimate and bro science wonīt cut it when it comes to pharmacology my friend.

                            What the hell does that even mean, it's not bro science when a doctor carries out a medical study? Did you read anything in my post, the entirety of the post was referencing medical studies not anecdotal theories...

                            Comment

                            • #15
                              Originally posted by ghostrider View Post
                              Well I love da carb too, bro science, not so much but I have to admit itīs funny sometimes.
                              whats bro science to you? a lot of science is based on the experiences bros made, just saying

                              Comment

                              Previous 1 2 template Next
                              Working...
                              X