very interesting. it seems the buildup induced by aromatase inhibition results in the accumulation of competitive inhibitors androstendione and testosterone which limits the long-term efficacy in men.
This is a simple problem. if you get maximal suppression of 62% at 12 hours from one dose but it is reduced to 38% after 10 days, you should take more (as long as it's well-tolerated). I think what they're proposing is reasonable. However, it also suggests that simply using higher doses of any of the aromatas inhibitors (including letrozole) in males will result in the maximal suppression numbers approaching those obtained in females with lower doses because the problem is the increase in competitive inhibition. If that is the case, then I'd have to go with high-dose letro for gyno or precontest water reduction and aromasin for everything else.
Dosing aromasin at 12 hrs is a great idea and may be all that is required since it is a suicide inhibitor. That way, constant high levels of aromasin will keep androstenedione and Test from binding aromatase so much.
the arimidex study in men is the one i was thinking of. Paradoxically, 1 mg was no better than 0.5 mg ed. This would tend to argue that competitive inhibition was not the problem. Also, i wish they had not combined the 25mg and 50 mg results.
If these drugs are less effective in men for some idiopathic reason that cannot be overcome with higher doses, then aromasin, arimidex, or perhaps a combination of AIs may be the best way to go to really dry someone out.
This is a simple problem. if you get maximal suppression of 62% at 12 hours from one dose but it is reduced to 38% after 10 days, you should take more (as long as it's well-tolerated). I think what they're proposing is reasonable. However, it also suggests that simply using higher doses of any of the aromatas inhibitors (including letrozole) in males will result in the maximal suppression numbers approaching those obtained in females with lower doses because the problem is the increase in competitive inhibition. If that is the case, then I'd have to go with high-dose letro for gyno or precontest water reduction and aromasin for everything else.
Dosing aromasin at 12 hrs is a great idea and may be all that is required since it is a suicide inhibitor. That way, constant high levels of aromasin will keep androstenedione and Test from binding aromatase so much.
the arimidex study in men is the one i was thinking of. Paradoxically, 1 mg was no better than 0.5 mg ed. This would tend to argue that competitive inhibition was not the problem. Also, i wish they had not combined the 25mg and 50 mg results.
If these drugs are less effective in men for some idiopathic reason that cannot be overcome with higher doses, then aromasin, arimidex, or perhaps a combination of AIs may be the best way to go to really dry someone out.
Comment